Engineering change management in complex system networks
PDF

Keywords

System of systems
lifecycle management
MBSE
PLM
CAD/CAE
Digital Thread
Digital Twin
variant and configuration management

How to Cite

Engineering change management in complex system networks. (2025). Journal of Intelligent System of Systems Lifecycle Management, 3. https://doi.org/10.71015/0kr2tg27

Abstract

In modern development landscapes, products are no longer isolated artefacts, but densely networked systems comprising mechanics, electronics, software and data driven services. Changes are inevitable but their effects behave like waves in water: a local impulse can influence sensor technology, control logic, mechanical tolerances and service processes across interfaces.

Engineering change management (ECM) has the task of identifying such chain reactions early on, making them manageable and keeping them traceable. The text shows why classic, paper based processes are too slow, too siloed and too bureaucratic in this reality, and outlines how modern approaches combine speed, transparency and collaboration. At its core is a systemic view of change: change propagation analysis and models such as dependency structure matrices make dependencies visible before they become costly. Digital twins, graph based analytics and AI supported pattern recognition support the evaluation by deriving probabilities and risks from historical change data and real time usage. Equally important is the organisational side: clear roles (from requester to CCB), short decision cycles, interdisciplinary reviews and a culture in which uncertainty can be openly addressed. Model Based Systems Engineering (MBSE), SysML and System Driven Product Development bridge the gap between disciplines; platform and modularity strategies limit spillover effects. Blockchain based traceability can increase auditability without slowing down collaboration. Because products are increasingly operated as services and updated throughout their lifecycle, ECM is expanding its focus from the end of development to operation, maintenance and return: over the air updates, variant statuses and field feedback are becoming part of the change dialogue. In practical terms, this means that decisions are based less on gut feeling and Excel and more on connected models, data flows and agreed governance rules. The article summarises empirical findings from industry and research: mature ECM organisations avoid duplication of work, reduce miscommunication and shorten throughput times provided that processes are lived and not just described. The end result is a model: a ‘nervous system’ for product development that quickly recognises stimuli, systematically evaluates effects, responds in a targeted manner and documents the decision making process in its entirety. ECM thus evolves from a reactive correction mechanism to a proactive design tool for complex system networks with measurable benefits in terms of quality, time and costs. The key is to give equal attention to technology and collaboration: only when models, data and people work together can changes be truly absorbed and used as a lever for innovation and lasting competitiveness.

PDF

References

Jarratt, T., Eckert, C., Caldwell, N., & Clarkson, P. (2011). Engineering change: An overview and perspective on the literature. Research in Engineering Design, 22(2). ResearchGate.

Brahma, A., & Wynn, D. C. (2023). Concepts of change propagation analysis in engineering design: A literature review and organising framework. Research in Engineering Design. Springer.

Loch, C., & Terwiesch, C. (1999). Managing the process of engineering change orders: the case of the climate control system in automobile development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(2). ResearchGate.

Clarkson, P., & Eckert, C. (2002). Product architecture and the propagation of engineering change. Proceedings of the Design Society. ResearchGate.

Ahmad, N., et al. (2011). Information models used to manage engineering change: A review of literature 2005–2010. Design Studies. NIST.

Sullivan, B. P. (2018). A review of changeability in complex engineering systems. Procedia CIRP. DiVA Portal.

Reddi, K. R., et al. (2011). A framework for engineering change management in manufacturing system. International Journal of Business Information Systems. ResearchGate.

Burggräf, P., Wagner, J., Saßmannshausen, T., & Weißer, T. (2024). AI artifacts in engineering change management – a systematic literature review. Research in Engineering Design. Springer.

Bock, C., & Barnard, F. (2013). Engineering Change Management Concepts for Systems Modeling. NIST.

Whyte, J., et al. (2016). Managing change in the delivery of complex projects. International Journal of Project Management. DiVA Portal.

Wilberg, J. (2015). Using a systemic perspective to support engineering change in complex systems. Procedia Engineering. DiVA Portal.

McCarthy, I. P., Rakotobe Joel, T., & Frizelle, G. (2000). Complex systems theory: Implications and promises for manufacturing organisations. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management. DiVA Portal.

Clarkson, P. J., et al. (2001). Modelling change propagation in complex systems: A review and new directions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48(3). ResearchGate.

Ullah, I. (2016). Engineering product and process design changes: a comprehensive review on engineering change management. Procedia CIRP. DiVA Portal.

Tryczak, J., Lis, A., Ziemiański, P., & Czyżewicz, J. (2024). Towards a Universal Model of Engineering Change Management. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. Springer.

Huang, G. Q., & Johnstone, G. (1995). CMCEA: Change mode, cause and effects analysis — a concurrent engineering approach to cost effective management of product design changes. ICED’95. ResearchGate.

Wright, I. C. (1997). A review of research into engineering change management: implications for product design. Design Studies, 18. ResearchGate.

Clarkson, P., Simons, C., & Eckert, C. (2004). Predicting change propagation in complex design. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design. ResearchGate.

Bossomaier, T., & Green, D. G. (2004). Complex Systems. Cambridge University Press. DiVA Portal.

Heaslip, R. (2020). Mindfulness and pre-occupation with failure in complex systems. In Ireland, V. (Ed.), Managing complex systems and projects. DiVA Portal.

De Weck, O. (2009). Change Propagation Analysis in Complex Technical Systems. MIT. DiVA Portal.

Habib, H. (2022). Managing Engineering Change within the Paradigm of Life Cycle Engineering. Processes. Springer.

Zheng, P., et al. (2019). Towards an automatic engineering change management in smart product service systems – A DSM based learning approach. Computers in Industry. MDPI.

Jarratt, T., Eckert, C., & Clarkson, P. (2003). A taxonomy of change. Technical Report CUED/C-EDC/TR123. University of Cambridge. DiVA Portal.

Clarkson, P., & Kipouros, T. (2025). Change Management Group, University of Cambridge Engineering Design Centre – Change Prediction Method (CPM). University of Cambridge. Springer.

Giffin, M., et al. (in review). Case study: Change propagation in complex systems. DiVA Portal.

Ulrich, K. T., & Martin, M. V. (2002). Design for variety: developing standardised and modularised product platform architectures. Research in Engineering Design, 13(4). ResearchGate.

Saeed, B., Bowen, D., & Sohoni, V. (1993). Avoiding engineering changes through focused manufacturing knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 40(1). NIST.

Maull, R., Hughes, D., & Bennett, J. (1992). The role of the bill of materials as a CAD/CAPM interface and the key importance of engineering change control. Computing Control Engineering Journal, 3(2). NIST.

Martin, V. M., & Ishii, K. (2002). Design for variety: standardised and modularised product platform architectures. Research in Engineering Design. ResearchGate.

Lindemann, U., Kleedorfer, R., & Gerst, M. (1998). The development department and engineering change management. Springer. ResearchGate.

Keating, M., & Katina, M. (2014). Complex System Governance: Concept, Utility, and Challenges. Unpublished manuscript. DiVA Portal.

Burggräf, P., et al. (2024). AI in ECM: Future Research Needs. Research in Engineering Design. Springer.

Sullivan, B. P. (2023). Changeability in complex engineering systems: definitions and elements. International Journal of Operations Production Management. Springer.

Ireland, V. (2020). Complex adaptive systems and systems engineering projects: Leadership and adaptability. University of Adelaide. DiVA Portal.

Salehi, V. (2024). Application of Munich Agile Concept for MBSE for a holistic approach to collect vehicle data based on board diagnostic system. Proceedings of the 44th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (CIE), Vol. 2B. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2024-141089.

Salehi, V. (2023). Application of Munich Agile Concept for MBSE-based development of automated guided robot based on digital twin-data. Proceedings of the 43rd Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (CIE), Vol. 2. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2023-110983.

Salehi, V. (2021). Application of a holistic approach of hydrogen internal combustion engine (HICE) buses. Proceedings of the Design Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.48.

Salehi, V., Wang, S. (2021). Application of Munich agile concepts for MBSE as a holistic and systematic design of urban air mobility in case of design of vertiports and vertistops. Proceedings of the Design Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.50.

Salehi, V. (2021). Integration of blockchain technology in systems engineering and software engineering in an industrial context. Proceedings of the Design Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2021.450.

Salehi, V., Taha, J., Wang, S. (2020). Application of Munich Agile Concept for MBSE by means of automated valet parking functions and the 3D environment-data. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2020-22040.

Salehi, V., Wang, S. (2019). Munich Agile MBSE concept (MAGIC). Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED). https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.377.

Salehi, V. (2019). Development of an agile concept for MBSE for future digital products through the entire System of Systems Lifecycle management called Munich Agile MBSE Concept (MAGIC). Computer Aided Design and Applications, 17(1), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.14733/cadaps.2020.147-166.

Taha, J., Salehi, V. (2018). Development of a low powered wireless IoT sensor network based on MBSE. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/SysEng.2018.8544420.

Salehi, V., Groß, F., Taha, J. (2018). Implementation of systems modelling language (SysML) in consideration of the CONSENS approach. Proceedings of the International Design Conference (DESIGN). https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0146.

Salehi, V., Wang, S. (2018). Web-based visualisation of 3D factory layout from hybrid modelling of CAD and point cloud. Computer Aided Design and Applications, 16(2), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.14733/cadaps.2019.243-255.

Salehi, V., Wang, S. (2017). Using point cloud technology for process simulation in digital factory. Proceedings of the ICED Conference. https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2220-4342.

Salehi, V., McMahon, C. (2016). Identification of factors during the introduction and implementation of PLM methods and systems in an industrial context. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (AICT). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33111-9_35.

Salehi, V., Burseg, L. (2016). System driven product development (SDPD) for mechatronic systems. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (AICT). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33111-9_66.

Salehi, V., McMahon, C. (2011). Development and application of an integrated approach for parametric associative CAD design in an industrial context. Computer Aided Design and Applications, 8(2), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.3722/cadaps.2011.225-236.

Salehi, V., McMahon, C. (2011). Development of an evaluation framework for implementation of parametric associative methods in an industrial context. Proceedings of the ICED 11 Conference (EID 2 s2.0 84858843777).

Salehi, V., McMahon, C. (2009). Methodological integration of parametric associative CAD systems in PLM environment. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference (DETC2009). https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2009 86583.

Salehi, V., McMahon, C. (2009). Action research into parametric associative CAD systems in an industrial context. Proceedings of the ICED 09 Conference (EID 2 s2.0 79957552184).

Salehi, V., McMahon, C. (2009). Development of a generic integrated approach for parametric associative CAD systems. Proceedings of the ICED 09 Conference (EID 2 s2.0 80054981163).

Salehi, V., McMahon, C. (2011). An integrated approach to parametric associative design for powertrain components in the automotive industry. Action Research. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (VDI Bayern).

Salehi, V. (2012). An integrated approach to parametric associative design for powertrain components on the automotive industry. University of Bath.

Salehi, V. (2015). Development and Application of an Integrated Approach to CAD Design in an Industrial Context. Impact of Design Research on Industrial Practice: Tools, Technology, and Training.

Salehi, V., Schade, D., Taha, J. (2015). Application of SysML in the research field of definition of the environment model for autonomous driving simulation. Proceedings of the Design Society Conference 2015.

Salehi, V. (2025). Integration of Munich Agile Concept for MBSE in an Industrial Context for Future Centralized Car Server Architectures. Proceedings of the ICIEA EU Conference, Munich University of Applied Sciences, Germany.

Salehi, V. (2025). A Holistic and Systematic Approach for Generation of Synthetic Data Sets from CAD Data Related CNC Production Environment. Proceedings of the ICIEA EU Conference, Munich University of Applied Sciences, Germany.

Salehi, V. (2025). Development of a Parametric Holistic CAD Design for Virtual Urban Air Mobility Concepts. Proceedings of the ICIEA EU Conference, Munich University of Applied Sciences, Germany.

Salehi, V. (2025). Application of Blockchain in case of Engineering Data Processes and Product Lifecycle Management System. Journal of Intelligent System of Systems Lifecycle Management. https://doi.org/10.71015/dm8rgj08.

Salehi, V. (2025). Application of Systems Engineering in context of building 3D Environment for Autonomous Vehicle Systems in an industrial context for Central Car Computing. Journal of Intelligent System of Systems Lifecycle Management. https://doi.org/10.71015/qgdjwx03.

Salehi, V., Witte, M., & Loos, M. (2025). Integration of Vehicle Data File based on Blockchain Technologie in an industrial context. Journal of Intelligent System of Systems Lifecycle Management. https://doi.org/10.71015/yxkfke75.

Salehi, V. (2015). An integrated approach for Sytem Driven Product Development (SDPD) by means of development of a mechatronic systems in an industrial context. ARC Conference.

Salehi, V. (2015). System Driven Product Development (SDPD) by Means of Development of a Mechatronic Systems in an Industrial Context. IFIP Conference.